Diliana Gresbrink
The U.S. has proposed a draft plan aimed at ending the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hezbollah. The plan includes an initial 60-day ceasefire, during which both Hezbollah and Israeli forces would withdraw from southern Lebanon. The U.S. hopes that the plan will encourage diplomatic efforts and reduce hostility in the region. The ongoing war between Israel and Hezbollah is complex and not recent by any means. This struggle is about power, territory, and influence in the Middle East. Hezbollah is a militant group and political party based in Lebanon. Hezbollah is heavily funded, trained, and armed by Iran, which uses the group as a proxy force to exert influence. Israel and the United States see Hezbollah as a major threat due to its military power and close ties to Iran. The United States has remained a close ally to Israel during this conflict for both domestic and global security reasons.
Iran’s support for Hezbollah is a significant factor in this conflict. Iran’s influence in Lebanon brings the country’s influence much closer to Israel, which considers Iran an enemy. By backing Hezbollah, Iran can indirectly attack Israeli interests without direct confrontation or repercussions. Iran supplies Hezbollah with weapons, financial support, and military training. This has made Hezbollah a very strong non-state military force.
Hezbollah's power is no longer just Lebanon’s issue but a regional one that threatens stability in the Middle East. Iran’s involvement also raised concerns for global security. Its backing of Hezbollah escalated the conflict and may prolong it, making peace negotiations harder to achieve. With Iran involved so heavily, there’s also a risk of the conflict spreading beyond Israel and Lebanon, as Iran could call upon other regional allies to support its interests.
This possibility is particularly concerning for the United States and its allies, as it would destabilize an already volatile region, making it harder to protect Western interests. The more control Iran gains over neighboring countries, the greater its influence on the global stage. The United States views Iran as a key adversary in international politics, so they actively work to stop this expansion. The United States has historically used its ally Israel to exert power in the Middle East, which explains the U.S.’s heavy involvement in this issue.
Another force that is driving U.S. involvement in the Middle East is oil. The Middle East is home to some of the world's largest oil reserves, and any instability in the region often disrupts oil supply lines. If a war between Israel and Hezbollah were to spread or even threaten key oil producers (like Saudi Arabia), oil prices could skyrocket globally. Such a spike would drive up fuel prices, increase inflation, and put immense pressure on the economies of oil-importing countries. It could destabilize the global economy, which the U.S. clearly has a vested interest in. By supporting Israel and attempting to prevent a full-scale regional conflict, the U.S. hopes to protect its own economic interests and maintain stability in global markets.
There’s also a terrorism angle here. Hezbollah is classified as a terrorist organization by the U.S. and several other countries, meaning it operates through both conventional and unconventional warfare tactics. If the conflict worsens, Hezbollah could launch attacks outside the region as a form of retaliation, endangering civilians and Western interests globally. Iran is closer than ever to having the materials necessary to develop a nuclear weapon, so the U.S. and other powers around the world are trying to de-escalate the tension as efficiently as possible. The fear of such attacks dramatically increased security concerns for U.S. and European governments.
The ongoing war between Israel and Hezbollah is more than a regional issue; it’s a conflict with far-reaching implications for global security. Iran’s support for Hezbollah gives the group the power to challenge Israel, leading to a conflict that could spiral into a broader war. The possibility of oil supply disruptions adds to the urgency, as it would have significant economic repercussions for the U.S. and other oil-dependent nations. Given these factors, the U.S. remains deeply invested in managing this conflict to avoid further escalation and protect its economic and security interests.
Comments